Proof

Three engagements.
Documented outcomes.

These are real numbers from real engagements. Client names are withheld. Industry descriptors replace them. The calculations behind each metric are documented in the engagement record.

Client Outcomes

The evidence

Medical Software Solutions

90-Day Sales Engine Build

B2B SaaS, 6-rep team, $4M ARR at engagement start. Pipeline review discipline absent. CRM data unreliable. Forecast accuracy running below 60%.

42%improvement in forecast accuracy

Forecast accuracy measured as variance between month-start committed forecast and actual closed revenue, averaged across 3 post-build quarters.

$4.6Mincrease in annual revenue

Year-on-year ARR comparison, 12 months post-build vs 12 months pre-build. Includes net new and expansion revenue.

35%reduction in deal slippage

Deals slipping beyond their committed close date as a percentage of total pipeline, pre vs post-build average.

Financial Services

90-Day Sales Engine Build

Institutional sales team, 4 reps, no formal pipeline review process. Qualification inconsistent across reps. Board-level forecast credibility low.

52%reduction in deal slippage

Deals moving past committed close date as a percentage of total active pipeline, pre vs post-build quarterly average.

23%annual committed revenue exceeded

Actual closed revenue vs board-committed annual target. First time target was exceeded in 3 years.

Multi-National Manufacturing

Strategic Advisory Retainer

International sales operation, 20+ reps across 3 regions. No unified ICP. Win/loss data not captured. Sales and strategy operating independently.

57%year-on-year revenue growth

Total revenue comparison, 12 months post-engagement vs 12 months pre-engagement across all active markets.

4new market verticals opened

New vertical market entries supported by structured ICP definition and strategic planning during the retainer period.

Evidence Standards

How these numbers are calculated

No approximations.

Every figure on this page has a documented calculation method. Where data was insufficient to calculate precisely, ranges are used. No metric here is an estimate dressed as a number.

Pre vs post comparison.

Improvement metrics are calculated by comparing the same measurement taken before and after the engagement. The comparison period is stated in the metric detail above.

Client names withheld.

Industry descriptors replace client names. No client outcome data is shared without explicit consent. The engagement records and calculations exist and are available for review under NDA.

See where your pipeline gaps are.

The Foundry Score takes 5 minutes. Composite score, five sub-scores, top three gaps.

Get Your Foundry ScoreSee the full Foundry